Monday 5 March 2012

The Continental: Yes to an Audi Rally Icon, No Thanks to a Dumb Number, Maybe to Tri-Turbos at Porsche

The Continental: Yes to an Audi Rally Icon, No Thanks to a Dumb Number, Maybe to Tri-Turbos at Porsche:

The Continental


Each week, our German correspondent slices and dices the latest rumblings, news, and quick-hit driving impressions from the other side of the pond. His byline may say Jens Meiners, but we simply call him . . . the Continental.


Audi Sport Quattro


There are great moments in the life of a motor journalist. For me, one of the best was driving a historic Sport Quattro that Audi brought along to the launch of the A1 Quattro in Sweden. Its short wheelbase and long overhangs look rather awkward, and in fact cutting the wheelbase by 12 inches was a half-baked attempt to counter the mid-engined, all-wheel-drive rally cars like the Peugeot 205 Turbo 16 and the Lancia Delta S4 that began to appear as a response to the original Audi Quattro.


In roadgoing trim—Audi built a little over 200 street cars for homologation purposes—the Sport Quattro is powered by a 306-hp variation of its legendary 2.1-liter inline-five. The car feels ultra-fast in a straight line, and the second wind above 3500 rpm—when the turbo hits full boost—would be impressive even in a modern sports car. But in corners, this car’s evil nature breaks through. The Sport Quattro has a tendency to understeer, but load changes will make the rear step out in an instant. It’s not a friendly car to drive quickly, and rally drivers like Walter Röhrl and Stig Blomqvist unequivocally state that Audi would have been better off refining the Rallye Quattro with the regular wheelbase. Nevertheless, the Sport Quattro, with its kevlar and fiberglass body, is an icon. It was an extraordinary experience to push it to the limits.


Audi A1 Quattro number plate


Audi claims the A1 Quattro is inspired by the Sport Quattro, and we agree it looks similarly wild, although graced with more digestible proportions. There is one detail I loathed: the plaque that says “1 of 333″ instead of disclosing the car’s actual production number. Obviously Audi wants to spare its sales and distribution channels having to deal with touchy customers throwing a fit when they don’t get their desired number. AMG started the annoying uniformity with its special editions years ago. I’d take any individual number over “one of the collective.”


A few kilometers south of Ingolstadt, BMW is launching its M Performance line with derivatives of the 5-series, the X5, and the X6. In the M550d xDrive and its SUV sister models, BMW’s 3.0-liter straight-six diesel is boosted by a Borg Warner–supplied tri-turbo unit: the package includes two small VTG high-pressure turbos and one large low-pressure turbo. The result is 376 hp from 4000 to 4400 rpm and 546 lb-ft of torque from 2000 3000 rpm. Thus equipped, the portly 5-series reaches 62 mph in a claimed 4.7 seconds and tops out at a governed 155 mph.


BMW M550d


The M Performance line is targeting Audi’s S models, and keeps a repectful distance to the true M cars. The diesels won’t come to the U.S., but we will see gasoline-powered M Performance cars in the future. The Z4 sDrive 35is would probably be an M Performance model now, and a similar derivative of the 3-series is likely. Moreover, a derivative of the 7-series would finally provide BMW with a true S -lass AMG and Audi S8 fighter.


While BMW is launching tri-turbos in the diesel-powered M Performance cars, I hear that Porsche is getting a tri-turbo ready for an upcoming gasoline engine. Meanwhile, an Ingolstadt engineer probably exaggerated only slightly when he joked that the complexity makes hybridization look like a low-cost proposition.


Volkswagen Passat Alltrack


Last week, I drove the Volkswagen Passat Alltrack near Kitzbühel, Austria. It’s a crossover based on the front- and all-wheel-drive European Passat station wagon, but the changes to the car go slightly beyond the usual cosmetics. It sits higher, and there is an “Off Road” button that helps you keep any speed between 1.2 and 19 mph when going downhill—if traction permits. When stepping off uphill, simply mash the gas pedal; the computer will select ideal revs. The electronic limited-slip function and the dual-clutch transmission are manipulated for better off-road performance as well. Lacking a low-range transfer case, the Passat Alltrack won’t get as far as a true off-roader, but it will hold its ground against most modern SUVs. I liked it.




Source : Google Reader

LeMons Southern Discomfort Day One: rbankracing.com Saab 9-3 Leads, Silver Errors 190E 2.3-16 in Second

LeMons Southern Discomfort Day One: rbankracing.com Saab 9-3 Leads, Silver Errors 190E 2.3-16 in Second:

LeMons Southern Discomfort Monte Carlo - Off-Track Excursion


With the Midwest tornadoes putting the concept of “bad weather” into perspective, the Southern Discomfort LeMons racers took a rainy green flag at Carolina Motorsports Park with nary a complaint. The downpours, however, did encourage a healthy amount of spinnin,’ slidin,’ and drivin’ full speed into ta’dirt in your Monte Carlo. Of course, this event marked the first time the LeMons has run the longer, trickier, and much faster full-length CMP configuration. With the soggy weather and higher-speed layout, even the best-handling cars struggled to keep all the wheels pointing the right way. (Monte Carlos didn’t stand a chance.)


As is often the case, however, such conditions don’t seem to affect the frontrunners nearly as much as the lower ranks–by the time the checkered flag fell on Saturday’s session, the top spots were filled with familiar faces.


LeMons rbankracing.com Saab 9-3


With once-proud Saab quickly slipping into oblivion, the race-leading 9-3 sedan of rbankracing.com is providing a pinpoint of light for the vegetative automaker. Or it’s possible that this Saab-centric team’s consistently excellent LeMons performances pushed the Swedish brand off the cliff more quickly. In any case, the 9-3′s turbocharged speed and clean-driving pilots will be difficult to beat on Sunday.


LeMons Silver Errors Mercedes-Benz 190E 2.3-16


The Ziegel Scheißhaus Racing squad—competing this time under the Silver Errors banner—managed to score a genuine Mercedes-Benz 190E 2.3-16 for LeMons money. Before you cry foul, remember this: Any Gordon Gekko wannabe worth his Rolex Submariner would have dumped his 2.3-16 at the first signs of trouble—which likely happened for every example right around the same time as the fall of the Berlin Wall. A ragtag bunch of careless owners likely followed, culminating in a lien sale from a 17-year-old owner who got sent to juvie after going DTM down Maple Street. That’s just one possibility, of course, but one thing is clear: Not all 2.3-16s are classics. The ZSR LeMons entry certainly isn’t a museum piece, but it’s DTM impression is halfway decent: Second place overall is a good result regardless of pedigree.


LeMons Hong Norrth Mazda MX3


Holding down the third spot is one of the most successful LeMons teams of all time, Hong Norrth. In fact, the team’s trusty Mazda MX3 has won the last five races it’s entered, so it’s way too early to count them out.


LeMons NSF Racing Mitsubishi Cordia


NSF Racing is rolling proof that LeMons is highly unpredictable. After this very blog predicted an early demise for the team’s factory-turbo Cordia, this example of a seldom-seen Mitsubishi soldiered (slowly) through day one with no terminal issues. Through the first half of the day, NSF held a lead over a handful of other teams with which they had friendly pre-race wagers. The cars in on the bet? The Cordia, a Ford LTD, a ’67 Galaxie, and the first-ever LeMons AMC Pacer.


LeMons NSF Racing Mitsubishi Cordia


But after spending the second half of day one battling a self-lowering redline, the Cordia crew finally had to break out the wrenches. The culprit—which we’ll charitably call “fuel contamination”—was eventually identified and remedied. The Cordia rejoined the track as the session was near its end, promptly setting NSF Racing’s (still glacially slow) fastest lap of the race.


LeMons Tunachuckers Ford LTD


With the Cordia taking a short vacation on pit road, the hulking Ford LTD of the LeMons-veteran Tunachuckers team surged ahead in the aforementioned unofficial race-within-a race. With the big Ford clicking off consistently quicker lap times than the Cordia, the Mitsubishi team will need an LTD problem on Sunday to retake the lead. Just by taking a quick glance at this rolling oil derrick, we’d say a problem is pretty likely.


Check back tomorrow for the race winners, and, as always, LeMons news, updates, race schedules, and more are available here.


LeMons Hong Norrth Mazda MX3



Source : Google Reader

Volkswagen Cross Coupé Concept Is Back, Goes Diesel Hybrid

Volkswagen Cross Coupé Concept Is Back, Goes Diesel Hybrid:

Volkswagen Cross Coupé TDI Hybrid Concept


When Volkswagen’s Cross Coupé Concept debuted in Tokyo last December, our curiosity was piqued by a theoretical powertrain that incorporated a four-cylinder gasoline engine and two electric motors. Now, just a few months later, the Cross Coupé takes the stage again, this time in Geneva. Although the exterior hasn’t changed, the innards have. VW was kind enough to paint it red so we could tell the difference.


2012 Geneva auto show full coverage


Keep Reading: Volkswagen Cross Coupé TDI Hybrid Concept – Auto Shows




Source : Google Reader

RSMP Daily Image #164

RSMP Daily Image #164:



Rating: 0.0/5 ( votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

RSMP Daily Image #163

RSMP Daily Image #163:



Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

Lightroom for Photographers

Lightroom for Photographers:

I realize every photographer has their own, unique workflow and way of accomplishing tasks when it comes time to wrangle images on the ‘ol computer, but i’m sure I am not alone when I say that it’s almost hard to remember what that workflow was like before Adobe came out with Lightroom. Personally, I admit to being skeptical and nervous about embracing it when it first stepped on the scene. Now, I actually get excited to sit down at my computer to simply look through images or to perform semi-extensive edits to a file or group of files. Lightroom simply makes working with your images enjoyable. In case you missed it earlier in the week, Forest Chaput de Saintonge posted a really good overview of his digital imaging workflow. You can read it here.


RMSP offers a workshop that is ideal for anyone interested in harnessing the full capabilities that Lightroom has to offer. Aptly titled, our Lightroom for Photographers workshops are led by longtime instructor and Adobe Certified Photoshop and Photoshop Lightroom Expert David Marx, and Forest Chaput de Saintonge, who also recently became an Adobe Certified Expert. Offered six times in 2012, this four-day course teaches you to organize your images and develop a structured workflow from import to enhancement to final export. Along the way you’ll learn to label, rate, keyword, sort and browse your images effortlessly.


Consider joining David or Forest for an insightful Lightroom experience in one of these cities in 2012:


Sacramento, California – April 26-29 (7 seats available as of 2-29)

Minneapolis, Minnesota – May 17-20 (3 seats available as of 2-29)

Billings, Montana – June 21-24 (10 seats available as of 2-29)

Seattle, Washington – July 26-29 (11 seats available as of 2-29)

Overland Park, Kansas – August 16-19 (15 seats available as of 2-29)

Missoula, Montana – August 23-26 (13 seats available as of 2-29)




Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

Birmingham Assignment Result … and a slight change.

Birmingham Assignment Result … and a slight change.:

Let’s hear it for Birmingham Weekend participant Ron Clemmons for turning in his “homework” from the assignment given at the weekend. Ron, you definitely get an A+ … not just for contributing … but for sharing such a beautiful image with our blog readers. Love the shallow depth of field, the composition and the pop of color. Nice job Ron! (continue reading below the photo)


© Ron Clemmons


And now I need to call your attention to the:


GREAT PHOTO WEEKENDS HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT SWITCH-A-ROO OF 2012!


I am changing the “rules” a bit for these assignments given at our Photo Weekends events. Since the goal of these assignments were to highlight images from our participants, I think it makes sense to cut the strings on the due date. It’s come to my attention that submitting images by Thursday following a weekend is too soon.


So, here’s the deal. If you have taken a Photo Weekend with us in 2012 and want to share a few images, GO FOR IT! Submit images inspired by a course you took at the Photo Weekend event, identify which Photo Weekend you attended, and I will get them posted here on the ‘ol blog.


After all, photographs are meant to be shared and seen!!!





Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

RSMP Daily Image #162

RSMP Daily Image #162:



Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)



Source : Google Reader

RMSP Daily Photo #161

RMSP Daily Photo #161:





















Yellowstone in Winter workshop, 2011.



Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

Yellowstone in Winter Workshop Student Slide Show

Yellowstone in Winter Workshop Student Slide Show:

Have the wilds of Yellowstone National Park in the winter been calling you and your camera? Do you crave to capture nature in its full glory in one of the planet’s most unique landscapes and ecosystems? Well, here’s a chance to experience it vicariously through the eyes and lenses of the participants in our recent Yellowstone in Winter workshop led by instructors David Marx and Doug Johnson. Many thanks to world-renown naturalist Jim Halfpenny for his expertise in guiding and educating the group concerning the abundant wildlife in the park. Enjoy the images and envision yourself in these footsteps during next year’s version of this fantastic experience!


If you simply can’t wait until winter, consider joining David and Doug for RMSP’s upcoming Yellowstone in Autumn workshop September 16-22!




Click here to view the embedded video.





Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

RMSP Daily Photo #158

RMSP Daily Photo #158:



Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

Digital Imaging Workflow

Digital Imaging Workflow:

Back in the film days, people would shoot through a roll of film, bring it to the lab and get their slides developed. Then, if they wanted a print, they would bring the slide back to the lab to have a print made. This process was repeated over and over again, until digital came along.


Currently, we are smack dab in the middle of the digital age, and cameras are only getting more advanced and offering photographers both more features and larger file sizes. This is great in many ways as it allows us to get higher quality images and use them in more applications than ever before.


This advancement in digital technology does however have some drawbacks, especially when it comes to the computer power needed to process these files and the order in which the process is done. I remember when I first started shooting with a Canon 10D (in 2003). It was around the time that I really started getting into photography and began helping out around the school more. I was using Photoshop 7, which was quite different than Photoshop is today.


These days, we need to develop a workflow that makes editing simple and efficient. Most photographers prefer to spend their time photographing rather than spending hours behind the computer editing and sorting their images. Having an inefficient workflow strategy can significantly increase your time behind a computer.


I hear a lot of people tell me that they can’t find any of their images after they import them into the computer, that they disappear into a “black hole” after they hit the import button. Workflow can help with this as well, if you are always sending images to the same place on your computer, you will always know where to go to find them.


Workflow starts in the camera, when you first click the shutter and it ends with output, when your photo finally reaches a printed page, website or slideshow. The steps in between are determined by the type of photography that you are interested in and the software that you choose to sort and edit your images. The workflow for a portrait photographer is much different that that of a landscape or adventure photographer. Many travel photographers will photograph for weeks without even looking at their images, because space and size limitations don’t allow them to travel with a laptop.


After you have taken the images, the first step is to import your images into your computer. This can be done a number of ways. If you are a studio photographer, shooting with your camera tethered to your computer will allow you to show the client a sample photo instantly on your computer screen, while you continue to shoot. If you are a landscape photographer it isn’t reasonable to bring your computer with you into the field, so most likely you will use a card reader to download your images when you return from the field.


The stage where you are importing files is where many people get flustered. They don’t know where to put their images on their computer and they don’t want to forget where they saved them. I would recommend storing your images on an external hard drive to help keep clutter off of your internal drive, on my drives I have one folder that is called “photos,” on which my images are broken down by the date that I shot them (in the format year-month-day, which makes it easier for computers to keep them organized) and a few well-chosen words describing what the shoot was. Something like: “2012-02-20 Snowshoeing Trip” is perfect, that way the computer will keep your images in chronological order and you will be able to tell what you shot on that day. It’s all pretty simple, you just need to fall into a rhythm as you import your images, there are lots of software programs out there that help make this process easier, and some will even do it all for you!



Here at RMSP we start all of our Workshop and Career Training students out by using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, a program that helps the photographer along all stages of their editing workflow, from import to export. Lightroom will actually make the dated folders for you, and all you need to do is add the few descriptive words about the file.


After I have my images imported, the next stage in my workflow would be to organize and sort the keepers, and delete the bad images. This is pretty easy to accomplish through most software programs, which offer the photographer flags, stars, colors or other ways to denote the images that you wish to hold on to, or delete. The amount of images that you keep totally depends on what type of photographer you are, I happen to be a heavy editor of my images, so I will only hold onto the best images from a shoot, but many photographers keep almost everything.


The next stage of the process is the “manipulation” or “editing” phase, in which you make any changes that you deem appropriate for your images. This depends entirely upon your personal choices about image manipulation. The choices are endless and it really comes down to comfort level with editing software and with what you want to accomplish in the end. Programs like Lightroom and Photoshop are complex and difficult to learn on your own. I have found that it is much easier to learn how to use these programs in a classroom setting, where a teacher at the front of the room can make the changes to the images while you follow along on your own computer. To me, editing is the most fun part of the workflow, it’s a chance for you to take your images and transform them into the way you want them to look, whether that’s accurate to what your eye saw when you shot the image, or something completely different. You have all of the control.


When you’re done editing, all that’s left is to “output” the images somewhere. Many photographers will make prints, post photos to their website or simply let them sit on their computers for their own enjoyment. It’s up to you.


Throughout your workflow, it’s of critical importance that you keep backing up your images on another external hard drive (preferably TWO other drives) to prevent losing your images. I have seen too many people who lose everything because they neglected to keep an active backup of their images. It is one of the most important things you can do as a photographer. It’s as simple as dragging all of your images over to an external hard drive once a week to ensure that they are located in more than one place at a time. There is also a way to automate this process and let your computer remember to do your image back up. Computers make mistakes and crash sometimes, it’s important to protect your images!


Every photographer has a different workflow, something that works for his or her type of photography and their shooting style. It is something that is developed over years of shooting. You want be able to find the “perfect” workflow right away, it takes time to find something that works for you and is fast and efficient.



Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

RMSP Daily Photo #159

RMSP Daily Photo #159:



Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Source : Google Reader

Buying Guide: Best ultra wide-angle lens for Nikon DSLRs: 8 tested

Buying Guide: Best ultra wide-angle lens for Nikon DSLRs: 8 tested: Buying Guide: Best ultra wide-angle lens for Nikon DSLRs: 8 tested

Ultra wide-angle lens for Nikon DSLRs explained

The 18-55mm or 18-105mm kit models supplied with most Nikon DSLRs (such as the D3100, D5100 and D7000) have effective zoom ranges of 27-82.5mm and 27-157.5mm respectively.

That's because of the 1.5x crop factor of DX-format Nikon cameras, which have APS-C (Advanced Photo System - Classic) sensors. They're smaller than the full-frame sensors fitted to the D700 or D3x, which are the same size as a frame of 35mm film.

On DX Nikons, an equivalent focal length of 27mm gives reasonably good wide-angle coverage but can be a little limiting.

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

At the telephoto end, using FX (full-frame) lenses on DX cameras can be a big bonus. The crop factor plays into your hands, turning a 300mm lens into one with an effective focal length of 450mm.

The tables are turned at the wide-angle end, where FX lenses with even the shortest focal lengths lose more than a little something in translation. For example, an 18mm FX lens on a full-frame camera will give an extremely wide angle of view.

But on a DX camera it will only be about 65 degrees from side to side, or 75 degrees from corner to corner.

Zooming in

DX-format ultra-wide lenses generally need to be designed specifically for APS-C cameras, and aren't compatible with full-frame DSLRs. The rear element extends further into the camera, enabling ultra-wide DX zoom lenses to give a typical range of about 10-20mm or 10-24mm.

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

At 10mm, the effective focal length is 15mm and the angle of view is much more impressive, at 105 degrees on the diagonal.

Zoom lenses are much more popular for ultra-wide shooting on DX cameras, to the extent that ultra-wide prime lenses are almost impossible to find.

However, we've included the Samyang 14mm prime lens. It's the only lens in the group that's designed for full-frame cameras, but still gives an impressively short effective focal length of 21mm on DX cameras. The diagonal angle of view is 114 degrees (FX) or 92 degrees (DX).

Zoom lenses are convenient, and reduce the frequency with which you need to change lenses on your camera. In the ultra-wide DX class, most lenses have a 2x zoom range of 10-20mm, whereas the Nikon and Tamron lead the field with a 2.4x range of 10-24mm.

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Most photographers tend to use ultra-wide lenses at or near their widest zoom settings most of the time. However, there's a lot to be said for shooting at 18mm with one of these lenses, in preference to a standard kit zoom lens, because barrel distortion is generally less pronounced.

The majority of ultra-wide lenses on the market have rectilinear optics. This means that if you were to shoot a sheet of paper from head on, its sides should be as straight as possible in the resulting image.

An alternative is a fisheye lens. These have curvilinear optics that produce a pronounced distortion effect. In the same paper test, the sides of the sheet would look as though they were bowing outwards.

Fisheye lenses

There are two types of fisheye lens, circular and diagonal. The former produces a circular image that only fills the central part of the image sensor, whereas diagonal fisheyes project a larger image circle that covers the whole frame.

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

We've included the Tokina 10-17mm fisheye zoom in this group, which is a diagonal fisheye and gives full coverage on an APS-C sensor throughout its zoom range.

Whether it's rectilinear or curvilinear, any ultra-wide lens is brilliant for exaggerating perspective. Shoot an object or person from close up and the background will appear to fall away at a much greater rate than when you shoot with a standard lens.

You can use this phenomenon to creative effect. For example, you could artistically distort the shape of three-dimensional subjects, or make tall buildings on a skyline appear to lean in towards each other dramatically.

Depth of field

Yet another bonus is that when you're shooting at really short focal lengths, you can get an enormous depth of field, enabling you to keep both close foreground subjects and distant background objects sharp within an image.

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

For example, if you shoot at 10mm with an aperture of f/11 and manually set the focus distance to its hyperfocal setting of 45cm, everything in the frame will be sharp from just 22.5cm away, all the way to infinity.

When it comes to autofocus, the Nikon lens and all the Sigmas in this group feature ring-type ultrasonic systems. These deliver super-fast, practically silent autofocusing complete with full-time manual override.

By contrast, the Tamron and Tokina lenses use conventional electric motors, which are slower and noisier. The Samyang has no autofocus at all, so focusing is a strictly manual affair.

Key ultra wide-angle lens features

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Lens hood

A flower-shaped lens hood comes with most ultra-wide lenses, and is useful for minimising ghosting and flare. In some cases, the hood is built into the lens.

Filter thread

Not all ultra-wide lenses have a thread for attaching filters. They're absent on the Samyang and Tokina 10-17mm ones, and can only be used at the longest zoom on the Sigma 8-16mm lens.

Mounting plate

All the lenses featured in this group have sturdy metal mounting plates, rather than the plastic mounts that are fitted to some cheap lenses.

Autofocus

Ring-type ultrasonic autofocus is best - it offers very fast and near-silent operation, along with full-time manual override.

Zoom range

A bigger zoom range can be a bonus, but for ultra-wide lenses a short minimum focal length is the key factor. About 10mm is ideal.

Focus distance scale

This is an advantage because it enables you to manually set the hyperfocal distance, for maximum depth of field in landscape photography.

Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC - £280/ $425

At first glance, a prime lens with no autofocus and an aperture ring at its base looks like a dinosaur. Sure enough, you have to set the Samyang's aperture to f/22 for use on Nikon DSLRs, after which apertures are set via the camera. But the lack of autofocus isn't as major a problem as you might think.

With ultra-wide lenses, the focus position isn't critical because the depth of field is so large. Even when depth of field is reduced, when you're shooting close in at the impressively large maximum aperture of f/2.8, you still get focus confirmation by way of the autofocus light in the viewfinder.

Performance

The 14mm focal length is impressive but the effective 21mm on APS-C cameras is less so. In our tests, images were usually overexposed by as much as a full stop (+1EV), requiring hefty amounts of compensation to be dialled in. Disappointingly for a prime lens, barrel distortion is noticeable. Optical quality is pretty good but the Samyang is only worth considering if you're on a tight budget.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Performance is poor at f/2.8, but the Samyang delivers impressive sharpness by f/4, and only really drops off again at f/22.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 14mm: 2239

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Colour fringing is only noticeable when you're shooting at the largest aperture of f/2.8, at the edges of the frame.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 14mm: 0.07

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

For a prime lens, barrel distortion is extreme, and uneven across the frame. We'd have expected better.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 14mm: -4.67

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

Overall image quality is poor at the largest aperture of f/2.8, but improves between f/4 and f/16, although barrel distortion is disappointing.

Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 SP AF

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 SP AF - £370/ $470

Five years ago, the main contenders on the ultra-wide zooms market were the Sigma 10-20mm and Tamron 11-18mm lenses. While the Sigma is still available, Tamron has upped its game with a newer 10-24mm lens that rivals the Nikon in terms of zoom range.

The Tamron is quite light but feels a little flimsy compared with most lenses in this test.
A few luxuries are lacking, such as the way the focus distance scale is only printed on the end of the focus ring, rather than beneath a viewing window. Autofocus is based on a slightly sluggish but fairly quiet conventional motor, so there's no full-time manual focus override available.

Performance

The Tamron frequently overexposes shots at the 10mm end of the zoom range, usually requiring exposure compensation. At a 20mm focal length, exposures are mostly accurate. There's a slight lack of sharpness at the largest apertures, but performance improves between f/8 and f/11. Good results are possible, but watch the exposure settings.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Outright sharpness is best at the crucial ultra-wide focal lengths, and remains consistent throughout the aperture range.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 10mm: 1681
Sharpness at 15mm: 1766
Sharpness at 24mm: 1488

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Fringing is only slightly noticeable in the 10-15mm zoom range. At longer focal lengths, chromatic errors are negligible.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 10mm: 0.33
Fringing at 15mm: 0.35
Fringing at 24mm: 0.96

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Distortion is well controlled overall, although barrel distortion is clearly visible at the 10mm focal length.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 10mm: -3.86
Distortion at 15mm: -0.23
Distortion at 24mm: -0.81

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

The Nikon delivers supremely accurate and consistent metering, and acquits itself excellently in all aspects of image quality.

Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM - £430/ $480

One of the first ultra-wide zooms designed for APS-C cameras, Sigma's original 10-20mm has stood the test of time. It might lack the constant aperture of the newer version but it's lighter in weight, has a more typical 77mm filter thread and is £70 easier on the wallet.

Despite its price, the lens boasts ring-type ultrasonic autofocus and comes with Sigma's usual extras, including a flower-shaped lens hood and good-quality carrying pouch. Overall build quality is high, and a match for the bigger, constant-aperture Sigma 10-20mm. Both editions of the lens carry Sigma's 'EX' designation, denoting superior build and optical quality.

Performance

This is one of the sharpest lenses in the group, even at the maximum available apertures of f/4-5.6. There's plenty of image contrast, and autoexposure values are consistently accurate in any light. Some lenses, such as the Samyang, are poor in this respect. Distortions are slightly more noticeable than with Sigma's 10-20mm f/3.5 lens, but it's a great buy at the price.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Sharpness is impressive, even at large apertures, where the lens outperforms Sigma's pricier 10-20mm f/3.5 model.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 10mm: 2402
Sharpness at 14mm: 2430
Sharpness at 20mm: 2124

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

There's quite a lot of fringing towards the image corners at 10mm, especially in the f/8 to f/22 aperture range.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 10mm: 0.24
Fringing at 14mm: 0.25
Fringing at 20mm: 0.41

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Barrel distortion is apparent at 10mm, turning to mild pin-cushion distortion that remains fairly constant from 14 to 20mm.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 10mm: -3.06
Distortion at 14mm: 1.11
Distortion at 20mm: 0.979

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

Image quality proved impressive in our lab tests, especially for sharpness at large apertures, where it's the best Sigma lens in the group.

Read the full Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM review

Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM - £500/ $650

Unlike Sigma's original 10-20mm zoom, this has a constant aperture of f/3.5, so the top aperture is f/3.5 across the zoom range. This makes it a little more than one stop 'faster' than the f/4-5.6 lens at 20mm, for faster low-light shutter speeds.

The f/3.5 is also 50g heavier, and has a larger front element to let in more light. Most lenses here have a 77mm filter thread, but this Sigma needs larger, pricier 82mm filters.

Performance

Like the other Sigma lenses on test, this one features fast, quiet and accurate ring-type ultrasonic autofocus, complete with full-time manual override. And, as is the case with all but the Samyang and Tamron lenses on test here, the focus distance scale is neatly tucked away beneath a viewing window. All in all, the Sigma feels well engineered to use, with good handling. We found that distortions were particularly well controlled. In our tests, though, sharpness wasn't quite as good as it was with the older Sigma 10-20mm lens, which is also cheaper.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

In the wider half of the zoom range, sharpness is only good from f/8 to f/11. It's disappointing at large or small apertures.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 10mm: 1919
Sharpness at 14mm: 1728
Sharpness at 20mm: 1951

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Chromatic aberration is most noticeable at each end of the zoom range, but is fairly well controlled between 14 and 18mm.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 10mm: 0.34
Fringing at 14mm: 0.3
Fringing at 20mm: 0.22

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Barrel and pin-cushion distortions are only visible at the shortest and longest extremes of the zoom range respectively.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 10mm: -2.52
Distortion at 14mm: -0.27
Distortion at 20mm: 0.85

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

Sharpness could be better at large and small apertures, especially at ultra-wide focal lengths, but overall image quality is respectable.

Read the full Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM review

Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 AT-X107 DX

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 AT-X107 DX - £510/ $670

Out on its own, this is the only fisheye zoom available for Nikon cameras. You can go wild with extreme barrel distortion for really funky images, the effect being most pronounced at the 10mm end of the zoom range. As is typical of fisheye lenses, it's considerably smaller than regular ultra-wide zooms, and weighs a mere 350g. The built-in hood doesn't allow filters to be fitted, which would cause massive vignetting. But, as with all Tokina lenses, overall build quality is great.

One benefit of the fisheye effect is that you get a full 180-degree angle of view at the 10mm zoom setting, which drops off to a still considerable 100 degrees at 17mm.

Performance

Despite the conventional motor, autofocus is fast, if a little noisy. It's normally not an issue, because focusing will usually be in the tiny fraction of the range that covers 0.4m to infinity. Shots are often severely overexposed, but image quality is good and, considering that fisheye lenses usually capture a lot of sky, the Tokina's resistance to ghosting and flare is welcome.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Nice and sharp, especially for a fisheye. The Tokina manages to resolve plenty of detail right into the corners of the frame.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 10mm: Not tested
Sharpness at 15mm: Not tested
Sharpness at 17mm: 268

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Colour fringing can be troublesome where there are high-contrast edges, such a dark branches against a bright sky.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 10mm: Not tested
Fringing at 15mm: Not tested
Fringing at 17mm: 0.489

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

As you'd expect from a fisheye lens, distortion is off the scale. It's most pronounced at the 10mm end.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 10mm: Not tested
Distortion at 15mm: Not tested
Distortion at 17mm: -15.4

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

Image quality is pleasing, but you need to watch out for overexposure. Note that the fisheye design meant we could not test at focal lengths other than 17mm.

Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM - £550/ $700

This is the widest-angle rectilinear lens available. Like all but the Samyang in this group, it's designed specifically for APS-C cameras, on which it has an effective shortest focal length of 12mm. This gives a huge diagonal angle of view of 115mm, enabling you to shoehorn in more of a scene.

Helping to deliver on the extra-wide-angle potential, the lens's front element is particularly bulbous, and the flower-shaped hood is built in. The lens cap fits via a secondary, circular hood, which also contains a 72mm filter thread around its front edge. The upshot is that you can only attach filters at the longest zoom setting, or you'll get extreme vignetting.

Performance

Sharpness is disappointing at the extreme edges of the frame, and at the centre at the largest available apertures. But it's quite acceptable between f/8 and f/16. Barrel distortion is also quite pronounced at the shortest focal length of 8mm, but is well contained in the 12-16mm sector. This is a good buy if you want to go extra large on your viewing angles.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

There's a lack of sharpness, especially at the 8mm end of the range, where you need to be between f/8 and f/16 for good results.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 8mm: 1643
Sharpness at 12mm: 1763
Sharpness at 16mm: 1935

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Performance is reasonable throughout the range. At mid to long focal lengths, fringing diminishes with smaller apertures.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 8mm: 0.28
Fringing at 12mm: 0.06
Fringing at 16mm: 0.11

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Barrel distortion is clearly visible at 8mm, but drops off at 12mm, switching to slight pin-cushion distortion at 16mm.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 8mm: 0.28
Distortion at 12mm: 0.06
Distortion at 16mm: 0.11

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

The Sigma 8-16mm really pushes the ultra-wide boundaries for a rectilinear lens. Ultimately, image quality is slightly compromised.

Tokina 12-24mm f/4 AT-X124 PRO DX II

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Tokina 12-24mm f/4 AT-X124 PRO DX II - £580/ $600

The Nikon-fit version of Tokina's original 12-24mm lens lacked an autofocus motor. So, on bodies that didn't have an internal AF drive, it could only be used in manual focus mode. The updated Mark II edition puts that right with a built-in motor, so autofocus is available with any Nikon body. Other improvements include new multi-coatings that aim to reduce ghosting and flare.

Like the Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 lens, this has a constant aperture, so the maximum aperture of f/4 is available throughout the zoom range. However, the shortest equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras is 18mm. Most competing lenses offer a 15mm effective focal length.

Performance

Whereas the Samyang, Tamron and Tokina 10-17mm lenses all have a tendency to overexpose images, this lens often underexposes by a third to a half of a stop. Autofocus is fast but noisy, based on an electric motor. There's no full-time manual focus override, but you get a push-pull action for switching between auto and manual focus quickly.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Sharpness at the centre of the frame is particularly good at the largest available apertures down to f/11.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 12mm: 2079
Sharpness at 15mm: 2159
Sharpness at 24mm: 2433

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Chromatic aberration is well controlled, and fringing is much less evident than with the original lens.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 12mm: 0.14
Fringing at 15mm: 0.17
Fringing at 24mm: 0.14

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Barrel distortion is only modest at the 12mm focal length. There's practically no distortion at 24mm.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 12mm: -2.55
Distortion at 15mm: -1.18
Distortion at 24mm: 0.04

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

It's quite an expensive lens to buy and lacks a little width in its maximum angle of view. Image quality is good in every respect though.

Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX - £670/ $860

With a zoom range of 10-24mm, equalled only by the Tamron lens, this is a worthy successor to Nikon's older 12-24mm lens. It provides a wider angle of view at its shortest focal length, and build quality feels robust, with silky-smooth zoom and focus rings.

The lens features two ED (Extra-low Dispersion) elements to ensure excellent sharpness and contrast, and the ring-type AF-S autofocus is super-fast and highly accurate.

Performance

The largest available aperture shifts from f/3.5 to f/4.5 as the focal length extends through the zoom range. For an ultra-wide zoom, the Nikon proved remarkably sharp at its largest apertures in our tests, and there was little vignetting, making it great for handheld shooting in dull light.

From low-lit indoor shots to sunny landscapes, the Nikon gives extremely accurate exposures throughout its zoom range. Distortions are a little more noticeable than with some lenses. But, then again, these can be tuned out automatically with Nikon's latest DSLRs.

Sharpness

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Outright sharpness is best at the crucial ultra-wide focal lengths, and remains consistent throughout the aperture range.

Lab test at f/8
Sharpness at 10mm: 1681
Sharpness at 15mm: 1766
Sharpness at 24mm: 1488

Fringing

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Fringing is only slightly noticeable in the 10-15mm zoom range. At longer focal lengths, chromatic errors are negligible.

Lab test at f/8
Fringing at 10mm: 0.33
Fringing at 15mm: 0.35
Fringing at 24mm: 0.96

Distortion

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

Distortion is well controlled overall, although barrel distortion is clearly visible at the 10mm focal length.

Lab test at f/8
Distortion at 10mm: -3.86
Distortion at 15mm: -0.23
Distortion at 24mm: -0.81

Image test verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

See full res image

The Nikon delivers supremely accurate and consistent metering, and acquits itself excellently in all aspects of image quality.

Read the full Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX review

Verdict

Best ultra wide-angle lens for nikon dslrs: 8 tested

For reliable, consistent, top-quality results in practically any conditions, the Nikon 10-24mm is a clear winner.

Sharpness is excellent even at the largest aperture, and images have bags of contrast, even when lighting conditions are flat and gloomy. The ring-type AF-S autofocus system is superbly fast, practically inaudible in operation and comes complete with full-time manual focus override.

Build quality is a good match for Nikon's top APS-C cameras, such as the D7000 and D300s, yet the lens still feels well balanced on lightweight bodies such as the D3100.

The only sticking point with the Nikon is that it's by far the most expensive lens in the group. For a more modest outlay, both Sigma 10-20mm lenses offer advanced features, but the older Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 version is particularly good value.

The Tamron 10-24mm is the cheapest zoom lens in the group, but suffered from exposure inconsistencies in our tests and lacks the Sigma lenses' ring-type ultrasonic autofocus.

For maximum wide-angle coverage, the Sigma 8-16mm is a tempting proposition, but image quality isn't quite as good as with the two Sigma 10-20mm lenses. Another alternative is the Tokina 10-17mm fisheye lens, which gives the widest angle of view in the group.

But the fisheye effect is more of an oddity than something that will appeal on a regular basis. At the other end of the scale, the angle of view offered by the Samyang 14mm and Tokina 12-24mm lenses are disappointing, and the Samyang's distortion is pronounced, especially given that it's a prime lens rather than a zoom.

Best ultra wide-angle lens for Nikons

If you've got a bigger budget, the Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S DX ED can't be beaten in terms of image quality.



Source : Google Reader